These Cryptos Can FREEZE Your Wallet!!
Published: 2025-11-22
Status:
Available
|
Analyzed
Published: 2025-11-22
Status:
Available
|
Analyzed
Predictions from this Video
Incorrect: 0
Prediction
Topic
Status
The Cosmos SDK has module accounts with a 'blocked address' function that could theoretically be modified to blacklist addresses, though this has not been implemented to date.
"Specifically, the Cosmos SDK has special accounts called module accounts. These aren't regular user accounts. They're controlled by the systems module logic rather than anyone's private key. Module accounts are unable to perform any kind of normal transaction. Instead, they're responsible for specific protocol functions such as staking, governance, and token distribution. Each module account has a function called blocked address, which is basically just a list of other module accounts. The idea is to prevent wallets, including other module accounts, from transacting with module accounts. and to help prevent any money being moved by module accounts in the event of a hack. The report notes that in theory, these module accounts could be tweaked to add other addresses to the blocked address function, essentially blacklisting them."
Pending
Cosmos SDK has the theoretical capability to implement blacklisting via module accounts, but currently, no projects within the ecosystem utilize this feature.
"the report notes that in theory, these module accounts could be tweaked to add other addresses to the blocked address function, essentially blacklisting them. But there is a huge caveat. None of the projects in the Cosmos ecosystem have ever actually used blacklisting in this way."
Pending
The widespread adoption of European Digital Identity wallets (EID 2.0) and similar global initiatives could lead to regulators monitoring, restricting, or blocking crypto transactions based on user identity, impacting privacy and censorship resistance.
"For instance, the EU is rolling out a European digital identity wallet under its EID 2.0 framework. Simply put, this could become a mandatory bridge between real world identities and blockchain interaction. If other global players follow suit, regulators or intermediaries could start monitoring, restricting, or even blocking transactions based on identity, that would hit the privacy and censorship resistance hard and push us closer to a dystopian world where every move you make is tracked and controlled."
Correct
BNB Chain implemented fund freezing capabilities in response to a past attack, rather than having them initially.
"Notably though, BNB didn't even have fund freezing capabilities until they added them in response to this attack."
Correct
Privacy coins like Monero (XMR), Zcash (ZEC), and Dash (DASH) could become crucial for financial privacy as regulatory oversight on crypto increases.
"Decentralization makes networks harder to control, and privacy coins like Narrow, Zcash, and Dash let users keep their transactions shielded from surveillance. As regulators push for more oversight, these tools could become the last line of defense for financial privacy."
Correct
Aptos implemented its blacklisting features in July 2024, approximately 6 weeks after the Cedus hack, whereas Sui had similar features since April 2023.
"However, Bybit's research revealed that unlike Sooie, which had public blacklisting features since April 2023, Aptos didn't implement theirs until July of this year, roughly 6 weeks after the Cedus hack."
Correct
The Sui Foundation successfully froze $162 million of stolen funds and subsequently recovered the remaining stolen assets directly from hacker addresses after a governance vote.
"As such, they managed to freeze $162 million of the 223 million that was stolen. Not a bad result, but freezing funds only solved part of the problem. So the Suie team took it one step further. After a governance vote that passed with over 90% approval, the Sooi team recovered the funds directly from the hacker's address."
Correct
Vchain blacklisted 469 hacker-associated addresses, successfully freezing approximately 727 million VET tokens out of 1.1 billion stolen.
"In any case, the problem was quickly identified by the Vchain team, who managed to prevent the funds from being liquidated by blacklisting every address associated with the hacker, all 469 of them. Crazy stuff. In total, the hacker made off with 1.1 billion VET tokens, but thanks to the Vchain Foundation's quick response, they were able to freeze about 727 million of those tokens, according to reports at the time."
Correct
The HECO Chain's efficient blacklist updating method concentrated significant power in the hands of a few individuals (contract admins), which may explain its limited adoption.
"Notably though, only the team's contract admin, which typically used either a multi-sig wallet or a governance account, had the permission to update the blacklist. This means that although Heko's blacklist method was efficient, it also placed an awful lot of power in the hands of just a few individuals. Come to think of it, this could be exactly why this method isn't more widely used."
Pending
Tether froze significant amounts of USDT in response to various illicit activities, including $800,000 in October 2023 for terrorism links, $5.2 million in May 2024 for phishing scams, and $46 million in 2022 from FTX assets at the DOJ's request.
"For example, in October of 2023, Tether froze 32 addresses linked to terrorism and warfare. Basically, Tether restricted the send USDT function of these wallets, resulting in over $800,000 in elicit USDT being frozen. Notably, this was a relatively small freeze. Back in May 2024, Tether froze $5.2 million in USDT across 12 wallets tied to fishing scams. They also froze $46 million of USDT from FTX when it collapsed in 2022 at the request of the DOJ."
Correct
Circle froze $58 million in USDC in May 2024, related to the Libra memecoin scandal.
"Like in May this year when it froze $58 million of USDC connected to the Libra memecoin scandal."
Correct
The EU's EID 2.0 framework, with its European digital identity wallet, may become a mandatory link between real-world identities and blockchain interactions.
"For instance, the EU is rolling out a European digital identity wallet under its EID 2.0 framework. Simply put, this could become a mandatory bridge between real world identities and blockchain interaction."
Correct
Privacy coins are predicted to become a critical defense mechanism for financial privacy as regulatory oversight increases.
"As regulators push for more oversight, these tools could become the last line of defense for financial privacy."
Pending