NPS vs MF vs PPF vs EPF | Which is Better? | CA Rachana Ranade
Published: 2025-07-02
Status:
Available
|
Analyzed
Published: 2025-07-02
Status:
Available
|
Analyzed
Predictions from this Video
Incorrect: 2
Prediction
Topic
Status
The number of NPS subscribers is projected to have doubled in the last 10 years, reaching approximately 2 crore.
"from there we have almost double in the last 10 years now the overall subscriber base for NPS is 2 crore"
Correct
The Assets Under Management (AUM) for NPS is expected to have grown approximately eight times in the last 10 years.
"and AUM has gone almost eight times"
Correct
NPS Vatsalya, a scheme for minors, was introduced in September 2024.
"NPS Vatsalya is for minors. And this was introduced I think in September 2024"
Correct
For aggressive investors in NPS auto choice, equity allocation starts at 75% until age 35, decreasing by 4% annually to 15% by age 55. Moderate investors start at 50% equity until age 35, decreasing by 2% annually to 10% by age 55. Conservative investors start at 25% equity until age 35, decreasing by 1% annually to 5% by age 55.
"aggressive investor 75% equity allocation will be done and balance in debt as I told you corporate bonds government bonds whatever and the allocation this 75% allocation can be allowed till you attain the age of 35 but after 35 till the age of 55 this equity allocation will go on reducing by 4% every year at the age of 55 it will be only 15% in equity balance in debt simple till here if I am talking about a moderate category of investor. It will be 50% in equity, 50% in debt. And 50% maximum allocation will be allowed till the age of 35, then it will keep on reducing by 2% every year, and ultimately, it will be reduced to 10% equity exposure by the age of 55. And if I am talking about a conservative restaker, a maximum of 25% equity allocation will be allowed till the age of 35, then it will go on reducing by 1% every year. And at the end of 55th year only 5% equity exposure will be remaining balance will be very simple"
Pending
Under NPS Active Choice, the maximum allowable equity allocation in a Tier 1 account is 75%.
"Maximum equity How much you can have as a part of your NPS portfolio maximum 75%"
Correct
NPS Tier 2 accounts offer complete flexibility in investment, allowing for 100% allocation to equity, corporate bonds, or government securities.
"Here there is no cap on investment. You can do either 100% equity or 100% corporate bonds or even 100% government securities."
Correct
Equity investments in NPS Tier 1 accounts have historically yielded returns between 12% and 13.5% over a 10-year period.
"equity has given somewhere between 12 % to 13 1/2 %"
Pending
NPS Scheme G Tier 1 investments have returned approximately 8-9% over 3 and 10-year periods.
"here it is somewhere around 8 to 9% for 3 years. Let Us Say It Was Again Roughly 9%."
Correct
Corporate bond investments within NPS have shown returns around 10%.
"here you can see a lot of them going into that 10% category too."
Correct
For taxpayers under the new tax regime, employee contributions to NPS (under sections 80CCD 1 and 80CCD 1B) are not tax-deductible. This trend is expected to continue, with a projected 90% of taxpayers opting for the new regime in the upcoming year, implying a significant portion will not receive these employee contribution benefits.
"For new tax regime. None of these neither ATCCD one nar ATCCD one be none of them is applicable. So this contribution of the employee is not tax beneficial. And of you ask me, this is going to again give you, oh my God, feeling, why in financial year 23, 24, around 74% of the taxpayers head opted for the new regime. And it is expected that nearly 90% of the taxpayers may opt out for the new regime in the next year. So, none of them is going to get the employee contribution benefit."
Correct
Under the new tax regime, employer contributions to NPS offer a higher tax deduction of up to 14% of salary (including basic and DA), which is more favorable than the old regime.
"And in fact, if you are under a new tax regime, you will get a deduction up to 14% of salary, salary includes basic plus DA. Here I Am Talking About What? Employer's contribution to NPS. And for a change, the new tax regime has higher deduction possibilities, right?"
Correct
Under the old tax regime, the total tax-deductible contribution for retirement funds (PF, Superannuation Fund, and NPS) is capped at ₹7.5 lakhs.
"all contributions by both employee and employer under all the sections listed for tax benefits have a maximum limit of 7.5 lakhs that includes contributions to PF Superannuation Fund and NPS under the old tax regime."
Correct
Tax deductions for NPS Tier 2 accounts are not available to individuals who have opted for the new tax regime.
"this deduction is not available for people who are under the new tax regime."
Correct
Upon retirement at age 60, up to 60% of the NPS Tier 1 corpus can be withdrawn tax-free. The remaining 40% must be converted into an annuity, the income from which will be taxable according to the individual's tax slab.
"60% is the maximum amount you can withdraw even when you retire at the age of 60. So, as a simple example, assume that you have ₹100. Just for simplicity, man. ₹100 at the time of retirement. Out of that 60 you can withdraw and this entire money will be tax free. So, 60% of whatever is your entire corpus at your retirement age, that you can withdraw at one shot and the entire amount will be tax free. What about the Balance 40? Balance 40 basically gets converted into annuity. ... this annuity amount will be taxable. As per your tax slabs"
Correct
In cases of premature exit from an NPS Tier 1 account, up to 20% of the accumulated corpus can be withdrawn tax-free.
"up to 20% of accumulated corpus Now here it is not about your contribution it is about up to 20% of accumulated corpus you can withdraw as a premature exit and this amount will also be tax free."
Correct
In the event of the NPS subscriber's death, any amount received by the nominee will be tax-free.
"whatever amount the nominee is going to get, that will be tax free."
Correct
NPS has a significantly lower expense ratio (0.03% to 0.09% per annum) compared to mutual funds, making it a more cost-effective option.
"for NPS it is 0.03% to 0.09% per annum. So I hope here clearly NPS is a winner as compared to mutual funds because here the expense ratio is extremely low."
Correct
EPF is currently offering an interest rate of 8.25%, while PPF is offering 7.1%.
"For EPF, I am giving you the latest rates it is 8.25% and for PPF it is 7.1%"
Incorrect
While mutual funds might offer higher returns, NPS is considered a better choice due to its significant tax benefits and lower expense ratio compared to mutual funds.
"if you are looking more for returns perspective mutual funds could be a choice but again very less tax benefit which is available here plus expense ratio is also shade on a higher side"
Pending
The number of NPS investors has doubled in the last 10 years, from 1 crore to 2 crore.
"from there we have almost double in the last 10 years now the overall subscriber base for NPS is 2 crore ₹136236 but two the number of investors in NPS has doubled in the last 10 years from 1 crore to 2 crore"
Correct
The Assets Under Management (AUM) for NPS has grown approximately eight times in the last 10 years.
"and from here sir it has gone to 1474298 again rupees in crore i think this is almost at times roughly. So the number of subscribers has doubled and AUM has gone almost eight times"
Correct
NPS Vatsalya, an NPS scheme for minors, was introduced in September 2024.
"And NPS Vatsalya which I did not talk about. NPS Vatsalya is for minors. And this was introduced I think in September 2024"
Correct
For aggressive investors in NPS, equity allocation reduces by 4% annually between ages 35 and 55, reaching 15% equity by age 55.
"After 35 till the age of 55 this equity allocation will go on reducing by 4% every year at the age of 55 it will be only 15% in equity balance in debt simple till here"
Incorrect
For moderate investors in NPS, equity allocation reduces by 2% annually after age 35, reaching 10% equity by age 55.
"then it will keep on reducing by 2% every year, and ultimately, it will be reduced to 10% equity exposure by the age of 55."
Correct
For conservative investors in NPS, equity allocation reduces by 1% annually after age 35, reaching 5% equity by age 55.
"then it will go on reducing by 1% every year. And at the end of 55th year only 5% equity exposure will be remaining"
Correct
Equity in an NPS Tier 1 account has historically provided returns between 12% and 13.5% over a 10-year period.
"here you will see that equity has given somewhere between 12 % to 13 1/2 %"
Pending
NPS Tier 1 accounts with maximum exposure to government bonds (Scheme G) have historically provided returns around 8-9%.
"So here it is somewhere around 8 to 9% for 3 years. Let Us Say It Was Again Roughly 9%."
Correct
NPS investments in corporate bonds have historically shown returns in the 10% range.
"here you can see a lot of them going into that 10% category too."
Correct
Employee contributions to NPS are not tax-deductible under the new tax regime, which is projected to be adopted by approximately 90% of taxpayers in the upcoming year.
"For new tax regime. None of these neither ATCCD one nar ATCCD one be none of them is applicable. So this contribution of the employee is not tax beneficial. And of you ask me, this is going to again give you, oh my God, feeling, why in financial year 23, 24, around 74% of the taxpayers head opted for the new regime. And it is expected that nearly 90% of the taxpayers may opt out for the new regime in the next year. So, none of them is going to get the employee contribution benefit."
Correct
Under the new tax regime, employer contributions to NPS are eligible for a deduction of up to 14% of salary (basic + DA).
"And in fact, if you are under a new tax regime, you will get a deduction up to 14% of salary, salary includes basic plus DA. Here I Am Talking About What? Employer's contribution to NPS. And for a change, the new tax regime has higher deduction possibilities, right?"
Correct
Government employees, regardless of their tax regime (old or new), can claim a deduction under Section 80 CCD 2 for employer contributions to NPS, up to 14% of their salary (basic + DA).
"if you are a government sector ah employee then be it old regime and new regime you the government contribution employer contribution here will be government contribution up to 14% of salary again salary is basic plus DA that will be eligible for deduction under section under 80 CCD to"
Correct
Under the old tax regime, the combined maximum limit for tax-deductible contributions to PF, Superannuation Fund, and NPS is ₹7.5 lakhs.
"Kindly note that all contributions by both employee and employer under all the sections listed for tax benefits have a maximum limit of 7.5 lakhs that includes contributions to PF Superannuation Fund and NPS under the old tax regime."
Correct
Under the new tax regime, the entire ₹7.5 lakh limit under Section 80 CCD is available for employee contributions to NPS, allowing for deductions up to this amount.
"under the new tax regime entire limit of 750 will be available under section 80CCD so maximum contribution here employee years contribution I am talking about if it is up to even 7.5 lakhs that can be eligible for deduction."
Correct
To claim the ₹1,50,000 deduction under Section 8C for NPS Tier 2 accounts, the investment must be locked in for a minimum of three years.
"But here you have a minimum lock in period for three years. So, if you want this 8C deduction of ₹1,50,000, your investment gets locked in for a minimum period of three years."
Correct
Withdrawals from an NPS Tier 2 account are taxable according to the individual's tax slab.
"Whenever you are withdrawing money from a tier to NPS account, whatever withdrawal you are doing that is taxable as per your tax slabs."
Correct
At retirement (age 60), 60% of the NPS Tier 1 corpus can be withdrawn tax-free.
"60% is the maximum amount you can withdraw even when you retire at the age of 60. So, as a simple example, assume that you have ₹100. Just for simplicity, man. ₹100 at the time of retirement. Out of that 60 you can withdraw and this entire money will be tax free."
Correct
The remaining 40% of an NPS Tier 1 corpus at retirement is converted into an annuity, and the annual payouts from this annuity are taxable according to the individual's tax slab.
"Balance 40 basically gets converted into annuity. ... this annuity amount will be taxable. As per your tax slabs what weight entire 40% is not tax at one shot. It's annuity, right? So that 40% remaining sum amount will be paid every single year and that is the reason why it is called as annuity. Correct? Every year some amount you will receive out of that balance 40% and this amount that you receive every year that will be taxed as per your tax slab simple."
Correct
Up to 25% of the self-contributed amount in an NPS Tier 1 account can be withdrawn for predefined emergencies before retirement, and this amount is tax-free.
"If you want, you can withdraw up to how much? Almost up to 25% of the self contributed amount that will be the amount that you can withdraw"
Correct
Upon premature exit from NPS, up to 20% of the accumulated corpus can be withdrawn tax-free.
"up to 20% of accumulated corpus Now here it is not about your contribution it is about up to 20% of accumulated corpus you can withdraw as a premature exit and this amount will also be tax free."
Correct
In the event of the subscriber's death, the amount received by the nominee from NPS is tax-free.
"in case of unfortunate death, if it happens, of course whatever amount the nominee is going to get, that will be tax free."
Correct
NPS offers a significant advantage over mutual funds due to its extremely low expense ratio (0.03% to 0.09% per annum compared to 0.3% to 1.8% for mutual funds).
"NPS is a winner as compared to mutual funds because here the expense ratio is extremely low."
Correct
For individuals with a very low-risk appetite, EPF and PPF are viable retirement options, and NPS with 100% debt exposure can also serve this purpose.
"If you have as good as near zero risk taking appetite. Even EPF PPF can be good options, but you can also go at with 100% debt exposure in NPS."
Correct