ilmscore | WTF Just Happened To California?!

WTF Just Happened To California?!

Predictions from this Video

Total: 3
Correct: 0
Incorrect: 0
Pending: 3
Prediction
Topic
Status
New California bill will aggregate theft across multiple instances and locations to exceed the $950 misdemeanor threshold, and also creates a crime for possessing stolen property over $950, allowing warrantless arrests for suspected shoplifting.
"this new bill however aims to lump all the theft together so if you're caught stealing $500 worth of goods on day one and then another $500 on day 89 even if it's in another County all of a sudden that's over the $950 limit and subject to Grand security camera security this also makes it a crime to possess stolen property over $950 which creates a crime that didn't exist before and it also allows peace officers to make a warrantless arrest if they suspect somebody is shoplifting"
California Retail Theft Laws
Pending
Santa Monica is mandated by California to build nearly 9,000 housing units, with over 6,100 being affordable. Failure to meet this requirement by 2029 could result in daily fines of $10,000 or the state overriding local zoning laws.
"the state of California has required us to build almost 9,000 units over 6,100 that have to be affordable so that's a different issue we have to build we don't have expansive uh areas of vacant land so we're literally going to take probably bergamont artstate we're going to take empty parking lots on Main Street in Santa Monica anything we can to try and satisfy the state because their law is we have to provide the units if we don't provide them starting in 2029 we can get find about $10,000 a day by the state or they can completely negate our zoning laws and just start zoning themselves"
Santa Monica Housing Mandate
Pending
The current approach prioritizes an individual's right to refuse services over intervention for those who may not be mentally capable of accepting help, suggesting the homelessness problem will persist regardless of funding. Some individuals may be functionally incapable of reintegrating into society without significant intervention.
"ultimately we've determined that it's better to protect someone's right to refuse service and live on the streets than get them the help they might not be mentally capable of accepting on their own and that means the problem is very likely to persist regardless of how much money you spend for instance I've witnessed people out there who I think are functionally incapable of ever assimilating back into society without severe intervention"
Homelessness Intervention Effectiveness
Pending